Back

Please note our offices and reception are closed on Good Friday and Easter Monday. We will re-open as usual at 9am on Tuesday 22 April.

Get in Touch Menu

The Dilnot report: care funding

19 July 2011

In July, the distinguished economist Andrew Dilnot published his report into the best way to fund care for people in old age. Willans’ Wills, Trusts and Probate team looks at the financial implications of nursing home costs and what that might mean in terms of arranging your affairs for the longer-term.

 

Recommendations

At the moment, a council will only fully fund care home places for those who are means-tested as having under £23,250 of capital assets. Dilnot recommends:

• that a person’s lifetime contributions towards his or her social care costs (currently potentially unlimited) should be capped at £35,000, after which they would be eligible for full state support

• that the means-tested threshold, above which people are liable for their full care costs, should rise from £23,250 to £100,000.

Even assuming the report’s recommendations are implemented, nothing will change on this front for several years. For now it will remain necessary to consider the effect of nursing home costs when looking ahead.

Act early

As with tax planning, there are ways to arrange one’s affairs more efficiently to try and protect one’s estate but it is vital to act early. You must act well in advance of needing care and be fit and healthy – a rule of thumb is that you should act by your sixties at  the latest.

The reason for this is the so-called ‘intentional deprivation of capital’ rule that makes up part of the Charging for Residential Accommodation Guide (or CRAG). CRAG governs the way local authorities are supposed to charge for care.

This rule can let a council treat an asset a care home resident has given away as still belonging to the resident, even if the gift was made years earlier.

It is unreasonable for a council to try to prove intentional deprivation if the resident dealt with his or her assets at a time when care was not foreseeable. However it seems likely that councils may be forced in future to interpret CRAG less generously.

Other options

Putting one’s house in trust might offer some advantages but it also has drawbacks and legal input here is essential.

It is sometimes forgotten that it is only the assets of the resident in care which are assessed. There can, therefore, be considerable benefit in the ownership of jointly-held assets being separated out. Again, particularly in relation to land, legal input can prove useful.

 

If you need clear and pragmatic legal advice, we’re here to help so please get in touch.

Contact us

Disclaimer: All legal information is correct at the time of publication but please be aware that laws may change over time. This article contains general legal information but should not be relied upon as legal advice. Please seek professional legal advice about your specific situation - contact us; we’d be delighted to help.
Contact
Simon Cook LLB (Hons), TEP
Partner
View profile
Simon Cook
Related services
Share this article
Resources to help

Related articles

Why changes to Business Relief mean you should start succession planning now

Wills, trusts & probate

In light of upcoming changes to Business Relief, it’s more important than ever to consider succession planning now. For generations, Business Relief (BR) has enabled business owners to pass on…

Rachel Sugden LLB (Hons), TEP
Partner

Max George and the importance of making a valid will

Wills, trusts & probate

A recent case reported in the media sheds light on the importance of making a valid will, as well as raises the question: should the government make electronic wills legally…

Leah Vincent LLB (Hons), LLM, TEP
Solicitor

Taking to the airwaves for Cobalt's 'Make a Will' campaign

Wills, trusts & probate

In support of Cobalt’s Make a Will month, our wills, trusts & probate team is once again donating their time throughout April to write or update a straightforward will in…

Willans
Solicitors
Contact us